Man, John (author).
Sept. 2008. 352p. illus. Da Capo, hardcover, $26 (9780306817670).

 As he traverses the Middle Kingdom’s most famous landmark, Man discovers complexities lurking behind beliefs that have long defined the Great Wall in popular imagination. It is, for instance, slack mythology that credits China’s first emperor with building the wall to protect his people from barbarian invaders. In truth, Man discovers that the wall long served chiefly to consolidate the internal political power of China’s ambitious rulers. Man even discredits the widespread belief that China built the wall as one unified structure. As he chronicles his own restless travels along a wild patchwork of many different walls, he probes a labyrinth of historical enigmas. Emperors give way to bandits, poets to commissars, as unpredictably as reed and earth supplant rock and brick. The wall’s architectural complexities thus become a huge metaphor for cultural evolution, as the serpentine partition links China’s buried past with its hoped-for future. Deploying the same lively style that attracted readers to his Genghis Kahn (2004), Man transforms a forbidding barrier into an inviting passageway into Asian culture.

— Bryce Christensen

(Source: Booklist)

A learned, lively history of the Great Wall's evolution that cuts it down to size without diminishing its allure. No, you can't see it from the moon. Nor is it an unbroken, serpentine glory of many thousand kilometers, all dressed stone and watchtowers; much of it is simply rammed dirt, sometimes a yard high. As a stone curtain keeping the northern barbarians at bay it was more of a sieve, though it did have its military uses. Sinophile Man (The Terra Cotta Army, 2008, etc.) offers a close, informed reading of historical documents as well as his observations based on many hours spent Wall-side. What emerges is a shifting, kaleidoscopic portrait-cultural, geopolitical, symbolic-that puts the mighty edifice into perspective. Man suggests that the Great Wall started as an expression of Chinese expansionism, rather than protectionism. Under the First Emperor, as China moved from city-state to nation-state in the third century BCE, the Wall marked borders, but they were fairly porous; "its main function [was] to serve China's internal political purposes: to define itself, to declare its identity to itself-and to keep its own people in line." The Han dynasty added to the Wall, which by the first century BCE also served as a road to transport goods, provide traders with safe houses and garrison soldiers. The pastoral-nomadic Mongols had no use for it and let it decay during the 12th century. After pushing them from power, the Ming dynasty embarked on a 200-year building spree designed to keep the Mongols on the other side of the Wall. The author's intent is not to diminish the Wall, but to ascertain its purposes and paint its many attitudes, from rude earth-and-reed bulwark to the fairy-taleadornment of the landscape. Man presents readers with a Wall for every season, even more awe-inspiring in its workaday clothes than in its romantic garb.

 (Source: Kirkus Reviews)

Các bài viết khác

• Tâm thức mới của miền Nam nước Mỹ
• Một “hồi ký” gây bối rối: Di sản - của ai?
• Chơi vơi giữa dòng
• Văn minh, nhân thân, và bạo lực – Đọc Amartya Sen
• Cái nhìn về một cuộc nội chiến
• 1% sẽ ăn hết của 99%
• Âm vang núi của Hosseini
• Đương đầu với quá khứ
• Thật giả ở thiên đường
• Và dãy núi vang vọng
• Xem thêm các bài viết khác >>